Senior Engineer
Project Manager
B.A. Special (Uni. of Kelaniya)
Project Coordinator
A Scientific Engineering Approach
Existing systems suffered from inefficient capture, leading to air quality degradation and potential fire hazards[cite: 3, 5]. Previous ductwork lacked proper fluid dynamic balancing[cite: 6]. We implemented an engineered solution for Machine 01 focusing on static pressure and capture velocity[cite: 8].
Capture velocity is the air speed required at the hood to "grab" dust particles before they escape[cite: 23]. Proper hood design maximizes velocity by minimizing the opening area[cite: 24].
The core engineering relationship used for balancing the system[cite: 26]:
Q: Flow Rate | V: Capture Velocity | A: Opening Area
Total mechanical energy in a flowing fluid remains constant[cite: 36]. In industrial ductwork, we must manage the conversion between static and velocity pressure[cite: 36].
Total Pressure ($TP$) is the sum of Static ($SP$) and Velocity ($VP$) Pressure[cite: 37]. Reducing $SP$ losses through smooth transitions allows for higher $VP$[cite: 40].
Legacy systems fail due to high friction caused by sharp bends[cite: 39]. Our new design uses optimized geometry to ensure laminar flow and minimize turbulence[cite: 40].
Motors and fans are sized perfectly for the required CFM[cite: 49]. This eliminates unnecessary vibration and ensures consistent suction at every machine port[cite: 46].
The data proves that by simply correcting ductwork geometry, we achieve nearly perfect capture without replacing expensive collector units.
Energy Savings [cite: 72, 73]
Maintenance Reduction [cite: 75, 76]
Thank you for your partnership. We are ready to proceed[cite: 79].